Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK210Ellesmere
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)24 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 24962304 ×2
Core clock speed562 MHz1243 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec179.0 ×2
Floating-point processing powerno data5.728 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs2x 4832 ×2
TMUs2x 208144 ×2
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm305 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB16 GB ×2
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed5012 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s224.0 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 24 April 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 250 Watt

Pro Duo Polaris has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Radeon Pro Duo Polaris. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 35 votes

Rate Radeon Pro Duo Polaris on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80m or Radeon Pro Duo Polaris, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.