Radeon 625 vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated868
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data3.96
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK210Polaris 24
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)13 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 2496384
Core clock speed562 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistors7,100 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/sec24.58
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs2x 488
TMUs2x 20824
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GB2 GB
Memory bus width2x 384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 13 May 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 625 has an age advantage of 4 years, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and Radeon 625. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80m is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 625 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 166 votes

Rate Radeon 625 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80m or Radeon 625, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.