Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU vs Tesla K80m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)no data
GPU code nameGK210no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date17 November 2014 (11 years ago)10 November 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2x 249616
Core clock speed562 MHz1296 MHz
Boost clock speed824 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate2x 182.2 billion/secno data
ROPs2x 48no data
TMUs2x 208no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount2x 12 GBno data
Memory bus width2x 384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5012 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth2x 240.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12.0 (11_1)no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2014 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 10 Watt

Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU has an age advantage of 5 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 2900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K80m and M1 Pro 16-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K80m is a workstation graphics card while Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m
Apple M1 Pro 16-Core GPU
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 228 votes

Rate M1 Pro 16-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K80m or M1 Pro 16-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.