GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs Tesla K80
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 413 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 3.50 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) |
| GPU code name | GK210 | GT218 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 17 November 2014 (11 years ago) | 12 October 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2496 ×2 | 16 |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 520 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 824 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,100 million | 260 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 31 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 171.4 ×2 | 4.160 |
| Floating-point processing power | 4.113 TFLOPS ×2 | 0.03936 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 ×2 | 4 |
| TMUs | 208 ×2 | 8 |
| L1 Cache | 208 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 1536 KB | 32 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 168 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB ×2 | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit ×2 | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1253 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 240.6 GB/s ×2 | 6.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.7 | 1.2 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 November 2014 | 12 October 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 300 Watt | 31 Watt |
Tesla K80 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.
210 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has 867.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Tesla K80 and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tesla K80 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 210 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
