GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand vs Tesla K8

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking514not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.98no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK104GF116
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 September 2014 (11 years ago)24 April 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536144
Core clock speed693 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed811 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,540 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate103.817.28
Floating-point processing power2.491 TFLOPS0.4147 TFLOPS
ROPs3224
TMUs12824
L1 Cache128 KB192 KB
L2 Cache512 KB384 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length241 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB1536 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.02.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 September 2014 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 1536 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Tesla K8 has an age advantage of 2 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GT 640 OEM Rebrand, on the other hand, has 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K8 and GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K8 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K8
Tesla K8
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand
GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Tesla K8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K8 or GeForce GT 640 OEM Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.