Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs Tesla K40st

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data24.99
Power efficiencyno data10.36
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BVega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 November 2013 (11 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28803584
Core clock speed575 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0336.0
Floating-point processing power3.312 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs240224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.125
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 230 Watt

Tesla K40st has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 8200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 6.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K40st and Radeon Pro WX 8200. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40st
Tesla K40st
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Tesla K40st on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.