ATI Radeon 9800 PRO vs Tesla K40st

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.23
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGK110BR350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 November 2013 (12 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880no data
Core clock speed575 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate138.03.040
Floating-point processing power3.312 TFLOPSno data
ROPs488
TMUs2408
L1 Cache240 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 47 Watt

Tesla K40st has an age advantage of 10 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO, on the other hand, has 421.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K40st and Radeon 9800 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K40st is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40st
Tesla K40st
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate Tesla K40st on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K40st or Radeon 9800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.