Radeon Vega 9 Mobile vs Tesla K40m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking576not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.36no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BPicasso
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 November 2013 (12 years ago)6 January 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880576
Core clock speed745 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate210.246.80
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPS1.498 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs24036
L1 Cache240 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount12 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 6 January 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 245 Watt 15 Watt

Vega 9 Mobile has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1533.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K40m and Radeon Vega 9 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K40m is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 9 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Tesla K40m
AMD Radeon Vega 9 Mobile
Radeon Vega 9 Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 21 votes

Rate Tesla K40m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 9 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K40m or Radeon Vega 9 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.