ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO vs Tesla K40m

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking560not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.33no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGK110BR300
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 November 2013 (11 years ago)22 January 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880no data
Core clock speed745 MHz325 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)245 Wattno data
Texture fill rate210.22.600
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPSno data
ROPs488
TMUs2408

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB128 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz310 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s19.84 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 2x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 November 2013 22 January 2003
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

Tesla K40m has an age advantage of 10 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K40m and All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K40m is a workstation graphics card while All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K40m
Tesla K40m
ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO
All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 21 votes

Rate Tesla K40m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K40m or All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.