Radeon RX Vega M vs Tesla K20X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data80.44
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGK110Vega
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 November 2012 (13 years ago)1 February 2018 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2688512
Core clock speed732 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1190 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate164.038.08
Floating-point processing power3.935 TFLOPSno data
ROPs488
TMUs22432
L1 Cache224 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth249.6 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 1 February 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega M has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1467% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K20X and Radeon RX Vega M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla K20X is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX Vega M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 54 votes

Rate Tesla K20X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 9 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K20X or Radeon RX Vega M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.