Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Tesla K20X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated655
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.76
Power efficiencyno data6.13
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK110Polaris 23
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 November 2012 (12 years ago)2 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,699 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2688640
Core clock speed732 MHz1082 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate164.034.62
Floating-point processing power3.935 TFLOPS1.385 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs22432
L1 Cache224 KB160 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1300 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth249.6 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 November 2012 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 65 Watt

Tesla K20X has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 261.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla K20X and Radeon Pro WX 3200. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla K20X
Tesla K20X
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 52 votes

Rate Tesla K20X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 89 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla K20X or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.