FirePro A300 vs Tesla D870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG80Trinity GL
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date2 May 2007 (18 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128 ×2384
Core clock speed600 MHz760 MHz
Boost clock speedno data905 MHz
Number of transistors681 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)520 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40 ×221.72
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS ×20.695 TFLOPS
ROPs24 ×28
TMUs32 ×224
L2 Cache96 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width2-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width384 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2007 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 90 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 520 Watt 65 Watt

FirePro A300 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla D870 and FirePro A300. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla D870
Tesla D870
AMD FirePro A300
FirePro A300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Tesla D870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FirePro A300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla D870 or FirePro A300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.