Radeon Vega 3 Embedded vs Tesla C1060

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BPicasso-M
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date9 April 2009 (17 years ago)2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240192
Core clock speed610 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)188 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate48.8014.40
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs8012
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 188 Watt 10 Watt

Vega 3 Embedded has a 358% more advanced lithography process, and 1780% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C1060 and Radeon Vega 3 Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla C1060 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Vega 3 Embedded is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla C1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 107 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 3 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C1060 or Radeon Vega 3 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.