Quadro NVS 280 PCIe vs Tesla C1060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGT200BNV37
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 April 2009 (16 years ago)25 May 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240no data
Core clock speed610 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)188 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate48.801.100
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs804
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 April 2009 25 May 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 188 Watt 13 Watt

Tesla C1060 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 172.7% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCIe, on the other hand, has 1346.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla C1060 and Quadro NVS 280 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Tesla C1060
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe
Quadro NVS 280 PCIe

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla C1060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla C1060 or Quadro NVS 280 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.