GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Tesla C1060
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 382 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 38.56 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GT200B | TU117 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 9 April 2009 (16 years ago) | 23 April 2019 (6 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 240 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 610 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1125 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 188 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 48.80 | 72.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 2.304 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 80 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1751 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB/s | 112.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.140 |
| CUDA | 1.3 | 7.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 April 2009 | 23 April 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 188 Watt | 30 Watt |
GTX 1650 Max-Q has an age advantage of 10 years, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 526.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Tesla C1060 and GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Tesla C1060 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
