RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation vs Tegra X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP10BAD103
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release dateno data21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2569728
Core clock speed854 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1465 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate23.44510.7
Floating-point processing power0.7501 TFLOPS32.69 TFLOPS
ROPs16112
TMUs16304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cacheno data9.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data576.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 120 Watt

Tegra X2 has 700% lower power consumption.

RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra X2 and RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra X2 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra X2
Tegra X2
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 36 votes

Rate Tegra X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra X2 or RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.