GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q vs Tegra X2 GPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGP10BGA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data11 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2562048
Core clock speedno data712 MHz
Boost clock speed1465 MHz1057 MHz
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate23.4467.65
Floating-point processing power0.7501 TFLOPS4.329 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Length87 mmno data
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data176.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Tegra X2 GPU has 133.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra X2 GPU and GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra X2 GPU is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra X2 GPU
Tegra X2 GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Tegra X2 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 123 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra X2 GPU or GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.