GeForce 9200M vs Tegra X2 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1357
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.18
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP10BC79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data15 October 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25616
Core clock speedno data450 MHz
Boost clock speed1465 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data314 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate23.443.600
Floating-point processing power0.7501 TFLOPS0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 2.0 x16
Length87 mmno data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 16 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 12 Watt

Tegra X2 GPU has a 306% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tegra X2 GPU and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra X2 GPU is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9200M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate Tegra X2 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra X2 GPU or GeForce 9200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.