Quadro RTX 8000 Passive vs Tegra K1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK20ATU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release dateno data13 August 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924608
Core clock speed756 MHz1230 MHz
Boost clock speed951 MHz1620 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate7.608466.6
Floating-point processing power0.3652 TFLOPS14.93 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLES 3.14.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 260 Watt

Tegra K1 has 3150% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000 Passive, on the other hand, has a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra K1 and Quadro RTX 8000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra K1 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 8000 Passive is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra K1
Tegra K1
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000 Passive
Quadro RTX 8000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 10 votes

Rate Tegra K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 23 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra K1 or Quadro RTX 8000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.