GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs Tegra 4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.19
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTegra 4TU106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 August 2013 (12 years ago)29 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1920
Core clock speed672 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1185 MHz
Number of transistors11 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate2.688142.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.55 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs4120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared6 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data264.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLES 3.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 August 2013 29 January 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 65 Watt

Tegra 4 has 225% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 4 and GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra 4
Tegra 4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate Tegra 4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 384 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra 4 or GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.