RTX 4500 Ada Generation vs Tegra 3 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated27
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.34
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTegra 3AD103
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date9 November 2011 (14 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7680
Core clock speed416 MHz2070 MHz
Boost clock speed520 MHz2580 MHz
Number of transistors10 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt210 Watt
Texture fill rate4.160619.2
Floating-point processing powerno data39.63 TFLOPS
ROPs880
TMUs8240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cacheno data7.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data432.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLES 2.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 November 2011 9 August 2023
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 210 Watt

Tegra 3 GPU has 950% lower power consumption.

RTX 4500 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 3 GPU and RTX 4500 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra 3 GPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX 4500 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tegra 3 GPU
Tegra 3 GPU
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
RTX 4500 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Tegra 3 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 26 votes

Rate RTX 4500 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra 3 GPU or RTX 4500 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.