A30 PCIe vs Tegra 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameTegra 2GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 June 2010 (15 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed300 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed400 MHz1440 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate1.600322.6
Floating-point processing powerno data10.32 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4224
Tensor Coresno data224
L1 Cacheno data10.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data24 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared24 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared3072 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data933.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/AN/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGLES 2.0N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2010 12 April 2021
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 165 Watt

Tegra 2 has 725% lower power consumption.

A30 PCIe, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Tegra 2 and A30 PCIe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tegra 2 is a notebook graphics card while A30 PCIe is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Tegra 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate A30 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tegra 2 or A30 PCIe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.