Quadro4 100 NVS vs TITAN V

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking80not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.29no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGV100NV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 December 2017 (6 years ago)22 December 2003 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120no data
Core clock speed1200 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate465.61.000
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPSno data
ROPs962
TMUs3204
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length267 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR
Maximum RAM amount12 GB64 MB
Memory bus width3072 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x LFH60
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA7.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2017 22 December 2003
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 10 Watt

TITAN V has an age advantage of 13 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 100 NVS, on the other hand, has 2400% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V and Quadro4 100 NVS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop card while Quadro4 100 NVS is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
NVIDIA Quadro4 100 NVS
Quadro4 100 NVS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3282 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro4 100 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.