Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M vs TITAN V

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking110not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.12no data
Power efficiency12.57no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Gen. 4.5 (2008)
GPU code nameGV100GL40
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 December 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512010
Core clock speed1200 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate465.6no data
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs320no data
Tensor Cores640no data
L1 Cache7.5 MBno data
L2 Cache4.5 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width3072 Bitno data
Memory clock speed848 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth651.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)10
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2017 1 October 2008
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm

TITAN V has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN V is a desktop graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V
TITAN V
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3338 votes

Rate TITAN V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 182 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about TITAN V or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 4500M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.