GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q vs TITAN V CEO Edition

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking85not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.10no data
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGV100GA106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 June 2018 (6 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51203840
Core clock speed1200 MHz817 MHz
Boost clock speed1455 MHz1282 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate465.6153.8
Floating-point processing power14.9 TFLOPS9.846 TFLOPS
ROPs12848
TMUs320120
Tensor Cores640120
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB6 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.08.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 June 2018 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 60 Watt

TITAN V CEO Edition has a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3060 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between TITAN V CEO Edition and GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that TITAN V CEO Edition is a desktop card while GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition
TITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 20 votes

Rate TITAN V CEO Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 185 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.