GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 vs T400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking539not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.20no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTU117G98
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 May 2021 (4 years ago)4 June 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3848
Core clock speed420 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,700 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate34.202.320
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPS0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs244
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-I
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.64.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.51.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2021 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 13 Watt

T400 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.

9300M GS DDR2, on the other hand, has 131% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between T400 and GeForce 9300M GS DDR2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that T400 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 413 votes

Rate T400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about T400 or GeForce 9300M GS DDR2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.