Radeon RX 7950 XT vs T400 4 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking458not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.43no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU117Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845376
Core clock speed420 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz3000 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate34.201,008
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPS64.51 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs24336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s800.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 300 Watt

T400 4 GB has 900% lower power consumption.

RX 7950 XT, on the other hand, has a 400% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between T400 4 GB and Radeon RX 7950 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that T400 4 GB is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7950 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB
AMD Radeon RX 7950 XT
Radeon RX 7950 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 57 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 49 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7950 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.