GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample vs T400 4 GB

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking457not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.70no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTU117GK180
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842880
Core clock speed420 MHz875 MHz
Boost clock speed1425 MHz928 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate34.20222.7
Floating-point processing power1.094 TFLOPS5.345 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs24240

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1753 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s336.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x mini-DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.65.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.21.2.175
CUDA7.53.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 250 Watt

T400 4 GB has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between T400 4 GB and GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that T400 4 GB is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA T400 4 GB
T400 4 GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 57 votes

Rate T400 4 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.