GeForce 210 Rev. 2 vs STG

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV1GT218
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 September 1995 (30 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed75 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors1 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate0.084.160
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUs18
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed50 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W31x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLN/A3.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 500 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 31 Watt

STG has 1450% lower power consumption.

210 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG and GeForce 210 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 7 votes

Rate STG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 81 votes

Rate GeForce 210 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about STG or GeForce 210 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.