Radeon Pro W6600 vs STG-2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data25.70
Power efficiencyno data27.57
Architectureno dataRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV1Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 September 1995 (30 years ago)8 June 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed75 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2903 MHz
Number of transistors1 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08325.1
Floating-point processing powerno data10.4 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm241 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed50 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W34x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 500 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 100 Watt

STG-2000 has 4900% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 25 years, a 819100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 7043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG-2000 and Radeon Pro W6600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that STG-2000 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro W6600 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 91 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 98 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about STG-2000 or Radeon Pro W6600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.