Radeon 740M vs STG-2000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated505
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data38.07
Architectureno dataRDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNV1Phoenix
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 1995 (29 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed75 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2500 MHz
Number of transistors1 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.0840.00
Floating-point processing powerno data2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs116
Ray Tracing Coresno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed50 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 500 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 15 Watt

STG-2000 has 650% lower power consumption.

Radeon 740M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 27 years, and a 12400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG-2000 and Radeon 740M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that STG-2000 is a desktop card while Radeon 740M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 65 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 71 vote

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.