CMP 30HX vs STG-2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated446
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.13
Power efficiencyno data7.19
Architectureno dataTuring (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV1TU116
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date30 September 1995 (30 years ago)25 February 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1408
Core clock speed75 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors1 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08157.1
Floating-point processing powerno data5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs148
TMUs188
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x4
Length168 mm229 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed50 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 500 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 125 Watt

STG-2000 has 6150% lower power consumption.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 25 years, a 614300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG-2000 and CMP 30HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that STG-2000 is a desktop graphics card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA STG-2000
STG-2000
NVIDIA CMP 30HX
CMP 30HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 87 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 38 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about STG-2000 or CMP 30HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.