Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU vs STG-2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
GPU code nameNV1no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date30 September 1995 (30 years ago)10 November 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed75 MHz1296 MHz
Number of transistors1 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology500 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt44 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08no data
ROPs1no data
TMUs1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIno data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeFPMLPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount1 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed50 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth400.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1.0no data
OpenGLN/Ano data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 1995 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 500 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 44 Watt

STG-2000 has 2100% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 25 years, and a 9900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between STG-2000 and M1 Max 32-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that STG-2000 is a desktop graphics card while Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 91 votes

Rate STG-2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 483 votes

Rate M1 Max 32-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about STG-2000 or M1 Max 32-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.