GeForce2 Ultra vs SIS Mirage M661FX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1550
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataCelsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameno dataNV15 A4
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 July 2003 (22 years ago)14 August 2000 (25 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speedno data250 MHz
Boost clock speed133 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data25 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data180 nm
Texture fill rateno data2.000
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Lengthno data183 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR
Maximum RAM amountno data64 MB
Memory bus widthno data128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data230 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data7.36 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data7.0
OpenGLno data1.2
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2003 14 August 2000

SIS Mirage M661FX has an age advantage of 2 years.

We couldn't decide between SIS Mirage M661FX and GeForce2 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that SIS Mirage M661FX is a notebook graphics card while GeForce2 Ultra is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


SIS Mirage M661FX
Mirage M661FX
NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra
GeForce2 Ultra

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate SIS Mirage M661FX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 52 votes

Rate GeForce2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about SIS Mirage M661FX or GeForce2 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.