ATI Radeon IGP 320 vs SIS Mirage 3 671MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1568
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataRage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code name671MXRS100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 June 2006 (19 years ago)5 October 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3no data
Core clock speed1 MHz160 MHz
Boost clock speed250 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data30 million
Manufacturing process technologyno data180 nm
Texture fill rateno data0.16
ROPsno data1
TMUsno data1

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataAGP 4x
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data7.0
OpenGLno data1.4
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 5 October 2002

SIS Mirage 3 671MX has an age advantage of 3 years.

We couldn't decide between SIS Mirage 3 671MX and Radeon IGP 320. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that SIS Mirage 3 671MX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon IGP 320 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


SIS Mirage 3 671MX
Mirage 3 671MX
ATI Radeon IGP 320
Radeon IGP 320

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 73 votes

Rate SIS Mirage 3 671MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon IGP 320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about SIS Mirage 3 671MX or Radeon IGP 320, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.