ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP vs Riva TNT2 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV5 B5RS880
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date15 March 1999 (26 years ago)10 September 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$299 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed150 MHz498 MHz
Number of transistors15 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm55 nm
Texture fill rate0.31.992
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03984 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed183 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.928 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.23.3
OpenCLN/A1.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 March 1999 10 September 2009
Chip lithography 250 nm 55 nm

ATI Mobility HD 4200 IGP has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 354.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 Ultra and Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva TNT2 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT2 Ultra
Riva TNT2 Ultra
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP
Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 45 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 60 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva TNT2 Ultra or Mobility Radeon HD 4200 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.