A800 PCIe 80 GB vs Riva TNT2 M64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV5 B6GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 October 1999 (26 years ago)8 November 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6912
Core clock speed125 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors15 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.25609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs2160
TMUs2432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount16 MB80 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed143 MHz1512 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/s1,935 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.2N/A
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 1999 8 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 80 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 7 nm

A800 PCIe 80 GB has an age advantage of 23 years, a 511900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 M64 and A800 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva TNT2 M64 is a desktop graphics card while A800 PCIe 80 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64
Riva TNT2 M64
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
A800 PCIe 80 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 38 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate A800 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva TNT2 M64 or A800 PCIe 80 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.