UHD Graphics 610 vs Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated970
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.89
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNV5 B5Coffee Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 March 1999 (26 years ago)3 April 2018 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed100 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors15 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.210.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs22
TMUs212

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xRing Bus
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed133 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.064 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 1999 3 April 2018
Chip lithography 250 nm 14 nm

UHD Graphics 610 has an age advantage of 19 years, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta and UHD Graphics 610. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics 610 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta
Intel UHD Graphics 610
UHD Graphics 610

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 705 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 610 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta or UHD Graphics 610, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.