Radeon Graphics vs Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated966
Place by popularitynot in top-10010
Power efficiencyno data9.39
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV5 B6Renoir
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 March 1999 (27 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data448
Core clock speed100 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors15 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology250 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.242.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs228

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed133 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.064 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 250 nm 7 nm

Graphics has a 3471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 and Radeon Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 28 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 8326 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 or Radeon Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.