Radeon 680M vs Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated529
Place by popularitynot in top-10074
Power efficiencyno data13.69
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV5 B6Rembrandt+
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 March 1999 (27 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed100 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors15 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.2105.6
Floating-point processing powerno data3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs248
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed133 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.064 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 1999 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 250 nm 6 nm

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 4067% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 28 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1215 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 or Radeon 680M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.