GeForce GT 430 PCI vs Riva TNT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameNV4GF108
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date23 March 1998 (27 years ago)11 October 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed90 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors7 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data49 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1811.20
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs24
TMUs216
L1 Cacheno data128 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed110 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.76 GB/s9.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-2.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 March 1998 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 350 nm 40 nm

GT 430 PCI has an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT and GeForce GT 430 PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT
Riva TNT
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 PCI
GeForce GT 430 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 83 votes

Rate Riva TNT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva TNT or GeForce GT 430 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.