FirePro M4150 vs Riva TNT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated877
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV4Opal
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date23 March 1998 (27 years ago)16 October 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed90 MHz715 MHz
Number of transistors7 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm28 nm
Texture fill rate0.1817.16
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5491 TFLOPS
ROPs28
TMUs224
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed110 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.76 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 March 1998 16 October 2013
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 28 nm

FirePro M4150 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT and FirePro M4150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva TNT is a desktop graphics card while FirePro M4150 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT
Riva TNT
AMD FirePro M4150
FirePro M4150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 87 votes

Rate Riva TNT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate FirePro M4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva TNT or FirePro M4150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.