CMP 50HX vs Riva TNT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureFahrenheit (1998−2000)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNV4TU102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 March 1998 (27 years ago)24 June 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3584
Core clock speed90 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1545 MHz
Number of transistors7 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data250 Watt
Texture fill rate0.18296.6
Floating-point processing powerno data11.07 TFLOPS
ROPs280
TMUs2192
Tensor Coresno data448
Ray Tracing Coresno data56
L1 Cacheno data3.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data5 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 MB10 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed110 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.76 GB/s560.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 March 1998 24 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 10 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 12 nm

CMP 50HX has an age advantage of 23 years, a 63900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2816.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva TNT and CMP 50HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva TNT is a desktop graphics card while CMP 50HX is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva TNT
Riva TNT
NVIDIA CMP 50HX
CMP 50HX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 83 votes

Rate Riva TNT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 62 votes

Rate CMP 50HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva TNT or CMP 50HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.