Switch GPU vs Riva 128

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameNV3GM20B
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 1997 (27 years ago)17 March 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed100 MHz384 MHz
Boost clock speedno data768 MHz
Number of transistors4 million2,000 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm20 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.112.29
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3932 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs116

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3No outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 17 March 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 20 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

Riva 128 has 275% lower power consumption.

Switch GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1650% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128 and Switch GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva 128 is a desktop card while Switch GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128
NVIDIA Switch GPU
Switch GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 44 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 148 votes

Rate Switch GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.