RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell vs Riva 128

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.97
Architectureno dataBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNV3GB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 1997 (28 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data14080
Core clock speed100 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors4 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate0.11,151
Floating-point processing powerno data73.69 TFLOPS
ROPs1176
TMUs1440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 MB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/s1.34 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W34x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.04.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 300 Watt

Riva 128 has 7400% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 27 years, a 1228700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Riva 128 is a desktop graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Riva 128
Riva 128
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 58 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 175 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva 128 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.