HD Graphics P4700 vs Riva 128

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataGeneration 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameNV3Haswell GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 1997 (29 years ago)1 June 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data160
Core clock speed100 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors4 million392 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt86 Watt
Texture fill rate0.126.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.416 TFLOPS
ROPs12
TMUs120

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xIGP
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed100 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x DB13W3No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.04.3
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.80

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 350 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 86 Watt

Riva 128 has 2050% lower power consumption.

HD Graphics P4700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1491% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Riva 128 and HD Graphics P4700. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 63 votes

Rate Riva 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 19 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Riva 128 or HD Graphics P4700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.