GMA 900 vs ATI Rage Mobility-M3

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Generation 3.0 (2005)
GPU code nameM3Alviso
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 October 1999 (25 years ago)2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed105 MHz333 MHz
Number of transistors8 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology250 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate0.211.332
ROPs24
TMUs24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xFSB

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed105 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth840.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DB13W3Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.09.0c
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL1.21.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 250 nm 130 nm

GMA 900 has a 92.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage Mobility-M3 and GMA 900. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage Mobility-M3
Rage Mobility-M3
Intel GMA 900
GMA 900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Rage Mobility-M3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 28 votes

Rate GMA 900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rage Mobility-M3 or GMA 900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.