Radeon R5 A240 vs ATI Rage Mobility-M1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1041
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.11
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameM1Oland
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 1999 (26 years ago)2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed83 MHz1030 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors8 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.1715.60
ROPs28
TMUs220

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed125 MHz1800 MBps
Memory bandwidth1 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5 (5.1)
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.1 (1.2)
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 28 nm

R5 A240 has a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage Mobility-M1 and Radeon R5 A240. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage Mobility-M1 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R5 A240 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage Mobility-M1
Rage Mobility-M1
AMD Radeon R5 A240
Radeon R5 A240

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Rage Mobility-M1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon R5 A240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rage Mobility-M1 or Radeon R5 A240, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.