RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs ATI Rage Mobility-M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRage MobilityAD107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date1 February 1999 (26 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed75 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors4 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08139.7
Floating-point processing powerno data8.94 TFLOPS
ROPs148
TMUs196
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed70 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth560.0 MB/s256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 1999 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 5 nm

RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation has an age advantage of 24 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage Mobility-M and RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage Mobility-M is a notebook graphics card while RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage Mobility-M
Rage Mobility-M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Rage Mobility-M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rage Mobility-M or RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.