Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics vs ATI Rage Fury MAXX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRage 4Beema
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 October 1999 (26 years ago)28 January 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data128
Core clock speed125 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data655 MHz
Number of transistors8 million930 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.25 ×24.800
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1536 TFLOPS
ROPs2 ×24
TMUs2 ×28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xIGP
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount32 MB ×2System Shared
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2System Shared
Memory clock speed143 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1.144 GB/s ×2no data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 1999 28 January 2015
Chip lithography 250 nm 28 nm

R3 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Rage Fury MAXX and Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Rage Fury MAXX is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Rage Fury MAXX
Rage Fury MAXX
AMD Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics
Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 7 votes

Rate Rage Fury MAXX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 50 votes

Rate Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Rage Fury MAXX or Radeon R3 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.